1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The land of the size of 1,663,00 square meters in Suwon-si, Suwon-si was an agriculture promotion area where farmland conversion is limited as a green production area (a good farmland), but was released from the agricultural-use restriction area around June 30, 2016.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant cancellation area”). (b)

On May 3, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for permission to engage in development activities to create a site for Class I neighborhood living facilities (retail stores-Building Construction Materials) (hereinafter “instant application”) on two lots of land, such as Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which belongs to the area subject to the instant cancellation (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. On June 20, 2018, the Defendant had failed to deliberate on the instant application by the Suwon City Urban Planning Committee, and as a result of the deliberation by the 6nd Suwon City Urban Planning Committee held on June 20, 2018, the Defendant presented the Defendant’s opinion of the deliberation that “In order to prevent any increase in social costs, such as economic aspects, in order to prevent any disorderly spread and preservation of farmland as a green production area for which farmland is grouped, and any unexpected development and establishment of urban planning in the future from the long-term point of view, the Defendant would be reasonable in accordance with the purpose and characteristics of designating the relevant special-purpose area, connection with infrastructure (water, sewerage, road, etc.), smooth flow of transit traffic, impact on the display of functions of surrounding farmland, and streetside landscape, etc. in accordance with the location of the building.”

On June 29, 2018, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the result of the deliberation by the Suwon City Urban Planning Committee (Consultation) on the sixth time in 2018 (hereinafter “the result of the instant deliberation”), and subsequently, on July 6, 2018, the Plaintiff filed the instant application in accordance with Article 56 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”) prior to the completion of the establishment of a comprehensive detailed plan for the relevant region according to the results of the instant deliberation.