beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 21, 2009, the Defendant: (a) in the office of “D” operated by the Defendant in “D” operated by the Defendant in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si; (b) if the Defendant lent the construction cost, he/she shall pay the victim E two interest monthly; and (c) the principal shall be paid up to October 21, 2009.
“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”
However, even if the average horizontal width of the highest level of sale as of October 2009 was converted, the Defendant held active property equivalent to KRW 116,500,000,000,000 for the real estate No. 116, 1503, and 1,000,000 won for the refund of the deposit for the deposit for the house purchase. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the loan to financial institutions, such as the Saemaul Treasury, with KRW 150,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the loan, and KRW 19,5,000,000,000 for the debt to the financial institutions such as the Saemaul Treasury, and KRW 36,65,000,000,00 for monthly interest to be paid, and there was no intention or ability to pay the loan from the person who suffered the income.
In addition, the defendant did not own a studio building in Chuncheon around that time.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received cash of KRW 10 million from the injured party around that time, and transferred KRW 20 million to a single bank account under the husband’s name around April 21, 2009.
2. On August 21, 2009, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around August 21, 2009, the Defendant would pay the victim interest twice a month on the loan of KRW 10,000,000,000,000 to the victim, and the principal would be repaid to the victim until he/she received the deposit from the Chuncheon Studio building.
“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay as agreed even if he borrowed money from the injured party because he did not pay 30 million won to the injured party as stated in paragraph 1.