1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to A vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a local government that installs and manages Asan City signal, etc.

나. 원고 차량은 2014. 1. 14. 18:16경 아산시 탕정면에 있는 십자( )형 동덕교차로에서, 신호대기를 위하여 편도 2차로 중 2차로에 정차하였다가 녹색신호로 바뀌자 앞 차량을 따라 위 교차로에 들어갔는데, 교차로 중간지점에 이를 무렵 신호등의 고장으로 인하여 역시 녹색신호를 따라 원고 차량 진행 방향 우측에서 좌측으로 편도 3차로 중 2차로를 따라 위 교차로에 진입한 B 운전의 C 차량(이하 ‘상대 차량’이라 한다)과 충돌하고, 그 충격으로 반대차로로 튕겨 나가 반대차로에서 정차하고 있던 D 운전의 E 차량(이하 ‘피해 차량’이라 한다)과 충돌하였다

(hereinafter “instant accident”). Each of the said vehicles driver sustained an injury due to the instant accident, and each of the said vehicles was damaged.

C. By October 8, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 677,380, the medical expenses of the other driver B of the vehicle, KRW 11,152,280, the expenses for the repair of the victimized vehicle, KRW 3,154,240, the expenses for the repair of the other vehicle, KRW 587,00, the expenses for the repair of the damaged vehicle, KRW 1,426,00, and KRW 16,996,90, and paid KRW 1,54,880 from the insurer of the other vehicle (former Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.) to the principal of the insurance proceeds, such as the medical expenses for D.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7, 10 through 16, Eul evidence 3 (including additional numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances, i.e., the facts of recognition and the evidence mentioned above (including evidence A, Nos. 9, 9, and Nos. 1 and 2) as revealed by the above facts and the aforementioned evidence, are the same at the time of the instant accident.