logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.09 2015고단4242
횡령
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant changed from May 1, 201 to F (State) 201. The Defendant served as his representative. On June 21, 2010, the Defendant repaid KRW 103,000,000, including interest on September 10, 2010 to the victim E who was introduced through D and paid KRW 100,000,000, including that on September 10, 2010. In addition, around the end of June 2010, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to invest in the chain store business that sells the goods imported from freezing, but the victim was able to doubt the profitability of the goods imported from freezing and sell the goods imported from frozen.

On June 2010, the Defendant met the victim on June 1, 2010, and “E president would purchase the freezing of the quantity of a container by paying the money.”

If you use the revenue stamp of the company to purchase it, and if you know well about the abortion business, you will sell the goods by using a kind of consignment sale business customer and transfer the sales proceeds in full to the E president, so you will not receive a separate fee.

“On July 16, 2010, the Plaintiff received KRW 148,415,400 from the person who consented to the check and received KRW 160,00,000 on the same day by returning KRW 11,584,60 on the day, and ultimately received KRW 148,415,400 on the day.

On or around July 16, 2010, the Defendant: (a) 23,546km from China for the victim; (b) 6km x 2,36km x (2) 5.4km x 2,076 x 11,210.4km x (1) x (2) x 23,546.4km x 23,546.4km x 16,65 g from that time to June 1, 2011; (c) 16,935km x 16.6 g from that time to June 1, 201; (d) 16,935km x 16.6 g from that time to June 1, 201; (g) 2016 g from that time to June 1, 201 (g) ; (g) 2016 g from that time to time to time to June 1, 2016.

arrow