logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.05.14 2014고단4034
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 12, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Ulsan District Court for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, on November 30, 2009, a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 3.5 million by the same court on January 21, 201.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter 2 cargo vehicles.

1. Around 22:20 on October 22, 2014, the Defendant driven the said cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.09% from the 2km section of approximately 2km to the Nam-gu Busan Nam-dong from the 2nd factory near Hyundai Motor Vehicle in Ulsan-dong to the 3rdnam-do, Ulsan-do, and the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.09% from the 2km section.

2. On October 22, 2014, at around 22:20, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases”), the Defendant driving of the said cargo from the Gondo apartment in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, and was straight down at a speed of about 30 km at a speed of about 30 km from the right-hand edge to the left at the right-hand edge from the right-hand edge.

At the time, there were nights and other vehicles are proceeding on the front side, so there was a duty of care to secure and proceed safe distance to avoid drilling when the preceding vehicle stops.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.09%, failed to perform his duty at the front time while driving in the same direction while neglecting his duty at the front time, led the victim D(W, 45 years old)’s back flod vehicle’s flod vehicle’s flod vehicle’s flod vehicle’s flod vehicle’s flod vehicle’s flod vehicle’s upper part.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused a traffic accident due to the above occupational negligence and suffered injury to the victim, such as a scarcity, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. D. D.

arrow