All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that Defendant A did not injure the victim, or Defendant B did not assault the victim. Although the Defendants did not insult the victim with the same content as the facts charged regarding the crime of insult of this case, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendants guilty, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the macroscopic evidence.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim F was relatively consistent from the investigative agency to the court below, to the court below, and Defendant B was scambling with his chest, and Defendant B was scambling with his own chest, scambling with his clothes, etc. on the part of other people, and the Defendants stated that they were the same as the facts charged regarding the offense of insult in this case (e.g., the trial record 57,58 pages) at the court below, ② Defendant B appeared as a witness at the court of the court below and led Defendant B while being scambling with his arms and clothes. The victim was scambling with the victim, and the victim was scambling with his own chest at the investigation agency, and the Defendants were scambling with the victim’s oral statement at the court below’s request by the court below to the effect that the Defendants were scambling with the victim’s oral statement.