logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.10.22 2019나16278
추심금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation part.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company that runs the business of selling petroleum refining, identical products, and ancillary products. C is a person who operated the gas station (hereinafter "the gas station of this case") under the trade name of "F station" on the second floor of the Cheongju-si, Seowon-gu D and the land E on the ground of Cheongju-si, and the defendant is a company that operates the gas station business.

B. On April 24, 2012, the Plaintiff and C’s petroleum products supply contract (hereinafter “instant supply contract”) concluded with C on April 24, 2012.

(1) The term “C” means the buyer (hereinafter referred to as “C”) who has entered into the contract and entered into any of the following terms:

) and supplier (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”)

(3) The purpose of Section 3(1) is to provide a buyer with various services related to the product and to ensure common interest and development, and to ensure the stable maintenance of the buyer’s business activities, and the buyer shall purchase from the supplier for 800 dums/months (e.g., the whole quantity, 1,000 dums/months) during the contract period. This contract period shall be one year from the date of the contract to April 23, 2013, provided that one party does not express in writing that the other party objects to the extension of the contract period, unless the other party expresses in writing his/her opposition to the extension of the contract period, this contract shall be automatically extended from the expiry date to the buyer for one year in order to grant the right to use the trademark in whole or in part.

arrow