A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Reference Facts] On December 20, 2017, on the ground that the Defendant did not count in the “C” drinking house located in Seocheon-si B on December 20, 2017, but avoided disturbance, the Defendant reported by the above drinking house proprietor, and calculated the drinking value to the Defendant E (29 years old) who was employed in the D Zone, and the said proprietor also did not want the Defendant to punish the Defendant.

was stated.

The injured party is unable to reach the house by taking the defendant into custody.

Based on the judgment, the defendant's cell phone flocks from the defendant and calls to the female flocks of the defendant, and the defendant flocks to the district along with the D zone, and the defendant voluntarily accompanied the defendant and went to the zone.

[2] The Defendant, without any justifiable reason, expressed that he was able to get off from the patrol car in front of the D District in the D DistrictF in 18:20 on the same day, and that he was able to take off from the patrol car in front of the D District in 18:20 on the same day. The Defendant, without any justifiable reason, expressed his desire to “I am out, and died. I am h., e., e., the head of the Gu,” and took twice the victim’s face face.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning public peace and order maintenance of the victim, and at the same time, the victim suffered damage to the face value of the victim in need of medical treatment for about seven days, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as strawing.

[Defense Counsel] When committing the crime of this case, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol and had mental and physical weakness or mental loss.

The argument is asserted.

According to the records of this case, even though the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time, the defendant's act at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant, the police officer at the time of the crime of this case, asked the drinking value to the owner of the foreigner's house, and the circumstances after the crime were committed, the defendant was in a state of having lost or weak ability to discern things

【Non-Recognition】

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;