logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.07.22 2014고단302
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 5, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Changwon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a summary order of KRW 3 million by the same court on May 7, 2012, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 00:05 on February 26, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a vehicle with approximately KRW 2 km from the front of a restaurant in which the trade name in the window of Changwon-si is unknown to the front of the Korean power located in accordance with 3.15, Muwon-si, to the front of the same city, without obtaining a driver’s license, and driving a vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.118% under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant forged private documents and uttering of the aforementioned investigation documents: (a) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) discovered the Defendant’s personal information at a traffic control assistant C in the Mapo-dong Police Station; (c) discovered the Defendant’s criminal information on the Defendant’s penal character; (d) made the police officer C enter “D” and “E” in the name column; (d) made the police officer’s signature in the name column; and (e) made the said police officer enter the personal information on the front driver’s license report PDA mechanical screen; and (e) signed the report as “D”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged a report on the statement of the state of the state of the state-employed driver, a written consent to voluntary behavior, and a written report on the state-employed driver, respectively.

3. The Defendant, at the above date and time, posted a false report on the statement on the status of the driver, a written consent to voluntary behavior, and a written report on the status of the driver, which was forged at the above place, to C, who did not know of the forgery, and exercised it respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow