logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.31 2016고단226
특수재물손괴
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around November 8, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the said car to the extent of KRW 680,000 for repairing costs, such as the replacement of the upper part of the F Karen car parked in front of the left side of the victim's car parked in front of the F Karen car, which was parked in front of it, and then damaged the said car to the extent of KRW 680,000 for repairing costs, such as the replacement of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the F Karen car which was left left after the left side, where the wife Eul did not pay the Defendant a debt equivalent to one million won to the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. On-site photographs and vehicle photographs;

1. Application of the written estimate (on November 10, 2015), receipts (on November 10, 2015), and statutes;

1. Article 369 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) appears to be contradictory to the Defendant’s mistake, and the amount of damage in this case is significant.

In particular, it is difficult to see the fact that the injured party did not want the punishment of the defendant because the defendant agreed with the injured party on May 2016, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case, and the defendant did not have any record of crime since 1977, and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered (in this case, the sentencing criteria shall not be applied at the option of fine).

arrow