1. Defendant B and YA Construction Co., Ltd. jointly with the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) KRW 6,342,00 and KRW 12.3

Basic Facts

On February 11, 2016, Defendant B awarded a contract for the construction of the Newly constructed Dog Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dog Construction”) to Defendant Dog Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dog Construction”), and Defendant Dogg Construction awarded a subcontract for the construction of the Dogg Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dog Construction”) among the Dogwon Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dogg Construction”).

From May 1, 2016 to July 15, 2016, the designated parties including the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiffs, etc.”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiffs, etc.”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiffs, etc.”) were to perform the mold construction in accordance with the mold construction subcontracted at the construction site of the said new construction site.

On July 2016, K of Defendant B and Defendant Y Construction: (a) prepared a document to the Plaintiff, etc. that the Plaintiff, etc. will pay all of KRW 64,30,000,00 (the aforementioned written statement, including KRW 64,340,340,00,00, which was unpaid out of KRW 65,340,000, and KRW 19,000,000, which was unpaid out of KRW 36,300,00,000, which was unpaid, within seven days after completion of the structural construction (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant documents”); and (b) completed the mutual assistance work around that time.

[Ground] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 1, and 2, Eul's assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the plaintiff's assertion as to the plaintiff's assertion, etc. are the daily workers who are the wood trees and do not receive wages from the defendants even though they have worked for the construction area Nos. 270,000 won in accordance with the order of the defendants, since the plaintiff et al. was not paid wages from the defendants, the subcontractor, direct contractor, and owner of the work is jointly and severally liable to pay wages to the plaintiff et al., and the defendant Eul is also liable to pay wages to the plaintiff et al. in accordance with

As to the cause of the claim, the claim against the construction of the defendant Dogwon.