Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for one year, respectively.

Criminal facts

[2] On October 10, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud in the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on November 29, 2015, and the above judgment was finalized on November 26, 2016. On April 29, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for imprisonment for one year and six months for fraud, and the above judgment was finalized on January 20, 2017. On August 10, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and ten months for fraud and became final and conclusive on August 18, 2017.

[2] Defendant A used the position of the president of the F Co., Ltd. in Changwon-si, Changwon-si E and 501 to subcontract the civil engineering works of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si with Defendant B

The author conspireds to acquire money from victims I.

According to the above public offering, at the K hotel coffee shop located in the J of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, on April 7, 2016, the Defendants would allow the Defendant “F ordered the Defendant to perform civil engineering works from H’s original office L, and if the F office cost is required before the commencement of the construction, it would be possible to enter into a subcontract for H reinforcement soil construction works if the Defendant leased the money KRW 100 million to the Defendant.

Defendant A at the F Office of F Co., Ltd. around 11:00 on April 15, 2016, the victim “one of the H four zones is us.”

It is possible to enter the beginning immediately after one week, and from the end of April 2016 to the end of April, 2016, L will return the advance payment from L around that time.

In the same place, Defendant B is entitled to receive the construction from F L, and Defendant B is required to affix the seal to the contract.

The contract of acceptance with the original administrative agency is within the guarantee of the contract.

“.....”

As a result, the Defendants subcontracted the 100 million won to the victim with H reinforced soil works, and the Defendants made a false statement as if they were able to repay money at the end of April 2016 at the latest.

(b).