beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 18:40 on August 1, 2012, the Defendant driven C Poter Cargo Vehicles while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.15% of alcohol alcohol concentration at approximately 4 km from the front of the Mapo-ri GSri GS station in the Gupo-Eup in Gwangju to the front of the same Eup/Myeon 608-4.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of a C Poter vehicle.
No person shall operate any automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance on a road.
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not purchase mandatory insurance, and operated the said vehicle from February 12, 2012 to August 1, 2012.
3. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) provided that the Defendant driving of CPoter Cargo Vehicles as the temporary border as described in paragraph 1, and driving a two-lane road in front of the Gopo-Eup Gopo GS station in Gwangju City along the two-lanes in front of the Gopo-si GS station in Suwon City, and changed the two-lanes into the one-lane.
In such cases, a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to make a change in the vehicle line by operating direction, etc. and giving prior notice of change of course and considering the traffic conditions of the front and rear left.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to pay attention to the left-hand side while changing the tea to the left-hand side of the foregoing vehicle due to the negligence on the left-hand side of the foregoing vehicle, which led to a shock of the top-hand fence of the victim D car.
The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim D and the victim F, who is the driver of the victimized vehicle, respectively, for two weeks of medical treatment, and also escaped without taking measures such as providing rescue to the victim, while destroying the damaged vehicle’s repair cost to the extent that it is equivalent to KRW 2,744,280, and thereby damaging the damaged vehicle’s repair cost.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. D. D.