logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.04.19 2013고단256
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on November 8, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of 2 million won by the same court on June 29, 2012.

On February 15, 2013, at around 00:07, the Defendant driven a BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 400 meters alcohol concentration of 0.058%, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the front day of Hoba, which is located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu to the front day of the 400m width of the Seogu, Seogu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Application of an inquiry letter or a copy of each summary order to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed on a person who commits a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that a person has no imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment and is against his/her gender);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow