logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.13 2016가단536400
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A, the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and Defendant C.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff leased each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 to Defendant B, and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3 to Defendant C

B. According to the special terms and conditions of a lease agreement concluded between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, the Plaintiff may renew the lease agreement on a two-year basis with a lessee meeting the requirements for occupancy under the Rental Housing Act. In this case, the lessee shall accept the terms and conditions of the lease deposit, rent, etc. as determined by the lessor and notify the lessor of the intention to renew the

C. Upon the expiration of each term of a lease agreement concluded with the Defendants, the Plaintiff presented the increased deposit and requested renewal as follows, but the contract was terminated due to the Defendants’ failure to comply therewith.

Serial Contractor A 1.1.1. 1. - December 31, 2015, 200 KRW 2 B B B 2.1.31.3,902,00 won on December 31, 2015, 31, 2015, December 31, 2015; 3. C C C 200 won on December 1, 2013, 2015, on December 301, 2015.

D. Accordingly, the Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the termination of the lease agreement and the delivery of the house, but the Defendants refused to comply therewith, notified the termination of each lease agreement again by serving a copy of the complaint of this case, and sought delivery of each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. Judgment rendered for each applicable provisions of Acts (Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow