1. The Defendant’s KRW 88,091,039 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 31, 2018 to July 4, 2018.

(2) As to the Plaintiff’s early August 2015 from around October 2015 to around October 2015, the lower court determined that: (a) rent of KRW 24,583,020 was paid by leasing KRW 300*300 to 106.625 tons and 250*250-H250 to 13.162 tons; (b) the lower court determined that the Plaintiff’s reimbursement of rent of KRW 300*300-H-300 to 31.058 tons and 250*250-H-162 tons was not recovered; and (c) the Plaintiff’s reimbursement of rent of KRW 250*250-H-31.096 tons at the Defendant’s early site on around October 2015 to 10,786,819; and (d) the Plaintiff’s reimbursement of rent of KRW 305,250-16 tons to the Plaintiff.

2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 5,369,839 won in total and 52,721,200 won [the sum of 35,729,839 won in total and 32,721,200 won in indemnity to the plaintiff [the sum of 75.316 tons in the East 2,75.30*300 tons in the East 300*300, 31.058 tons in the East 250*250, 13.162 tons in the H-sn 13.162 tons in the Young Y 13.250 tons and the sum of H-sn 31.096 tons in the territorial 250,000 won] from January 31, 2018 to July 5, 2018.

3. Judgment on the defendant's defense, etc.

A. As to this, the defendant's defense that the plaintiff agreed to settle the unclaimed H-sn beam amounting to KRW 460,000 per ton, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge the evidence Eul's evidence alone, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the defendant's defense is without merit.

B. Next, the Defendant is not responsible for preparing a written statement of non-performance with respect to 25 tons of 250*250 H-sn beam 31.096 tons, which was not recovered from the beginning of the early stage.