The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the Defendant suffers from illness, such as non-heating cerebral chrone, etc.

However, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for ten months due to a violation of the Punishment of Minor Acts, etc. Act of 2011 (damage to the object registered as a collective deadly weapon), and there are several criminal records. In particular, the defendant was punished twice as a obstruction of the performance of official duties, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period, as well as again committed the crime of damaging the public object of this case while being prosecuted and tried for the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties of this case, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and family environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., are not recognized to be too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.