logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.09.03 2013나5129
공사대금 등
Text

1. The main text of the judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended and added in the trial, shall be amended as follows.

Reasons

A. In the instant case, a single house site (hereinafter “RB”) is a single house site.

(i) substitute the same amount of money set-off or obtained by transfer as the benefit of the same money equivalent to that of the said money, 250 million won shall be paid in lieu of J real estate (Provided, That the tax amount of KRW 140 million related to the seizure of J real estate shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

(3) The remaining 650 million won [2.7 billion won - 1.5 billion won - 1.5 billion won - 350 million won - (250 million won - 140 billion won - 140 billion won)] prepared an agreement that shall be paid in two installments. A summary of the agreement with the Plaintiff and the Defendant (as of February 7, 2012, 2012), the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on February 7, 2012, stating that the agreement was made between the Plaintiff and the Defendant that the amount of 1.5 billion won in cash would be KRW 350 billion in the housing site, - KRW 1.5 billion in the real estate transfer KRW 2.5 billion in the real estate transfer KRW - KRW 2.5 billion in the real estate transfer* 4 billion in the real estate transfer by the Plaintiff* 4.5 billion in the real estate transfer by the Defendant* 5 billion in the real estate transfer by 5 billion won in the judgment of the Plaintiff.

(4) On June 20, 2012, C drafted a sales contract stating the purchase price of N and J real estate designated by the Plaintiff as KRW 500 million.

㈏ 그러나 앞서 든 증거나 이 사건 변론에 나타난 이 사건 합의의 경과와 그 내용 및 이 사건 확인서의 세부 내용 등에 비추어 본 아래 ①부터 ⑤까지의 사정과 원고와 피고가 J 부동산에 관한...

arrow