Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim E (n.e., 38 years old) are de facto marital relationships with the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF loan 201.

Around 03:00 on August 23, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim with his/her hand floor when he/she met the victim's cream with his/her her cream at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Certification of contents of the defendant (Evidence No. 81 to 85 of the evidence record);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the upper part of the photo (Evidence No. 16, 23, 28 of the evidence record);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the background and degree of the assault of this case; (b) relationship between the Defendant and the victim; and (c) the fact that there is no criminal history against the Defendant; and (d) the sentencing conditions, such as the age, sexual conduct, environment, etc. of the Defendant, shall be determined by

Parts of innocence

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the time and time as stated in the facts constituting the crime, was faced with the victim with a tree fluor who was set up on the floor at the floor and at the place, and when the victim resists the victim, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the victim's hair and faced with the wall, which would require treatment between about 210 days and about 36, 37, and 47 days.

2. The evidence that corresponds to the above facts charged is admissible, there are statements in investigation agencies of E, G and H and in this court, but it is difficult to believe in light of the following points.

A. E did not fall on the day of the assault, and even after the flaging, some flag went out into the sewage hole, and the rest of one is missing and stored in the investigative agency after 3 days after the flaging.

In making a statement, the 20th photograph of the evidence record was written as a photo taken by the investigative agency.

In doing so, H in investigative agencies and this Court, E.I.