logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.12.18 2014나44526
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the following money shall be cancelled:

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that "the part of "the actual income of the court" of the first instance, "the part of "the actual income of the court of first instance", "the fourth 16," and "the part of "the actual income of the court of first instance".

The portion of the future treatment cost for the part of the sex surgery for the future treatment cost, and the part of the 5th 14 to 16th .

The part of the consolation money shall be as follows, and the part of the consolation money shall be in the attached Form 7.

1. Attached sheet of calculation of damages;

1. The Plaintiff’s argument and the Defendant’s argument in the trial are as indicated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for adding the following judgments as to the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial. As such, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Completioned Parts]

(a) One personal information on lost income: Attached Form;

1. The term “basic matters” in the damages calculation table is as follows.

2) Income and operating period: According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 8, the plaintiff can be found to have been engaged in the delivery business at the time of the accident in this case. Considering the circumstances revealed in the entire arguments, such as the plaintiff's age and health condition, it is reasonable to deem that the plaintiff has earned income of at least 2 million won per month until October 20, 204 when the maximum working age expires. 3) The appraisal result of the first instance court appraiser F, E, the appraisal result of Gap evidence No. 12, the video and arguments, according to the following purport: ① labor ability loss rate of the plaintiff due to the accident in this case: 3.7% (i) labor ability loss rate of 3.7% due to the accident in this case; 9.8% due to ASEAN; Mabrog Calve, Mabromothm 20% due to malthromothal mal thromothm malm-M, 20% due to the M& 20% injury-M-M.

arrow