(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.08.22 2018가단325475

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.08.22 2018가단325475

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around March 17, 1992, the Defendant changed the lease contract and business registration 1) of the instant land owned by D and E, the Plaintiff’s parent, and the instant land owned by D and E (the land category on February 16, 2006 was changed from the land category to the “parking lot”.

D) The lease deposit KRW 25,00,000, monthly rent KRW 1,000,000, and the lease term from March 18, 1992 to March 17, 1993 was set and leased from D with respect to the instant parking lot (hereinafter “instant parking lot”) from the instant land when the lease contract was renewed or newly prepared as follows:

(2) On August 10, 2006, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale and purchase on the instant land on July 10, 2006. On February 28, 2007, the Plaintiff drafted a lease contract with F and F, the lease deposit amount of KRW 85,00,000 for the instant land and the lease term of KRW 12 months from February 28, 2007.

3) On or around September 15, 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendant set the lease deposit amount of KRW 400,000,000 for the instant land and the lease period from September 15, 201 to September 14, 201 (hereinafter “previous lease agreement”).

I prepared a protocol of compromise on the above lease contract within one month after the contract is made.

A sales contract may be executed after the expiration of two years after the expiration of the lease contract period.

The sales price shall be decided through mutual consultation.

b.if the sales contract is not concluded, it shall be extended to a one-year rental contract. The parking lot shall be cancelled.

The special agreement is written, and accordingly the Busan District Court 201No. 695 stated that "the protocol of protocol prior to the filing of a lawsuit between the plaintiff and the defendant" is "the protocol of protocol of protocol in this case."

was drawn up.

4. When the Defendant was unable to purchase the instant land, the Plaintiff shall survey the instant land with the highest priority and restore it to its original state in the presence of the Plaintiff on January 22, 2015.

In the instant protocol of conciliation.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2017.01.24 2015가단42923

-수원지방법원평택지원 2015.06.03 2014가합9689

-청주지방법원 2015.07.15 2014나6740

-서울남부지방법원 2014.01.21 2013가합101310

-부산지방법원 2017.10.25 2017가합44912