logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.06.12 2011가합96739
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On May 7, 2010, the original Defendant entered into a business and loan agreement (hereinafter “instant joint loan agreement”) with ENA (hereinafter “EN”) that implements the construction of an apartment building of the Housing Association of the 3-dong District Housing Association on May 7, 2010, the Plaintiffs and the Defendants constituted a lender and concluded a business and loan agreement (hereinafter “instant joint loan agreement”) with the content that the Plaintiff and the Defendants set up and lend KRW 50 billion to EN as of November 7, 2010 on the date of repayment. At the same time, the Dongyang Construction Industry (hereinafter “Dongyang Construction Industry”) as the contractor of the said new construction construction (hereinafter “Dongyang Construction Industry”) jointly and severally guaranteed the debt of EN.

Under the joint loan agreement of this case, each lender of the loans of this case, which are set forth in the joint loan agreement of this case, is KRW 5 billion, KRW 5 billion, KRW 5 billion, KRW 3 billion, and Daejeon Mutual Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff Hyundai Mutual Savings Bank"), KRW 4 billion, and KRW 4 billion, KRW 300,000,000, KRW 3000,000,000, and KRW 406,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00.

arrow