A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 1. 11. 17:40경 경북북부제2교도소 1수용동 C에서 조사 및 징벌 집행을 위해 보호장비를 다시 착용하려는 교감 D, 교위 E을 향해 “씨발새끼들아, 왜 채우는데, 이 씨발 것들아, 내가 누군지 알아 ”라고 하며 욕설을 하였고, 위 교도관들이 보호장비를 착용시켜 입실을 시키자, 피고인은 교도관들을 향해 발로 물컵을 걷어찼다.

After that, the defendant was accompanied by the first team room for confinement management, and the vice-principal D tried to sit the defendant in the counseling room, and assaulted D's right right-side mouth one time to walk.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of punishment of correctional officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each service report of F, D, and E;

1. A report on investigation (or photographs and medical certificates);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to protective equipment and an examination book;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the criminal facts [the scope of recommending punishment] Where the mitigated area (one month to eight months) of obstruction of performance of official duties is minor (a person subject to special mitigation] [a decision of sentence] the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (a decision of sentence] in April, the defendant has committed the instant crime against prison officers during the prison period, so he/she is selected to be sentenced to imprisonment, but the defendant reflects wrong, has no power to be punished for the same kind of crime, and the degree of assault is minor, etc., the sentence is determined as per the order.