logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정3381
업무상실화
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 16:10 on January 10, 2015, the Defendant completed the construction completion inspection of a building from the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries to December 21, 2014. However, even before completion inspection of the construction, the Defendant completed the construction completion inspection from the Public Procurement Service on December 24, 2013. However, even before completion inspection, the Defendant filed a report on the completion of water conditioning out on the pipe part of the pipe part of the pipe part to the above cooperation room, and decided to close the second completion inspection against the construction of the competent Young-gu Office.

Accordingly, the head of the site site D directed the defendant to use the pipes of the cooperation room for the defendant.

The Defendant, at the above time and place, kept a fire extinguisher within a radius of 5 meters, removed inflammable substances within a radius of 10 meters, and, if it is impossible to move such substances, performed safety measures to prevent fire in advance at the time of using them, such as covering the anti-tact, etc., but did not comply with the rules of the work instruction guidelines at the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency at the time of using them. However, despite the occupational duty that should prevent fire in advance at the time of using them, the Defendant: (a) carried out a melting work at the contact with the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, without observing the rules of the work instruction guidelines at the time of using them; and (b) carried out a melting work at a distance of about 30 cm from an acute m ( approximately 0.1m Alluium composite of Aluminium, approximately 20m high aluminium, and destroyed and damaged the amount of 27, 400, 190 square meters, and 400 square meters.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each protocol of police statements of E, D, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;

1. Relevant Articles 171 and 170 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow