Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 19:45 on February 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven the B rocketing taxi with work, and proceeded in the three-lane from the front of the main office of the Daegu Bank, Daegu East East-dong, Daegu-si to the main office of the Daegu Bank, Samsung 2; (b) stated the victim C’s indictment, which was faced with the central line and left the opposite lane due to the occupational negligence of the U.S., was stated as “E” in the instant indictment; (c) however, according to the record, it is clear that the C is a clerical error in the “C”; (d) Da C’s 250 Oro-si, the front part of the instant indictment was received from the front part of the Hata-si right-hand taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment from the above victim due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C:

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes (as of 40 pages of investigation records);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of [the determination of types] the general traffic accident: The basic area of the injury [the scope of recommendations] caused by traffic accidents; April to October (the general person in charge): the admission to the taxi mutual aid association; the mitigation element: other cases falling under the proviso of Article 3 (2) of the Special School Act (the central line intrusion); the cases falling under the proviso of Article 3 (2) of the Special School Act (the suspension of execution); the cases falling under the proviso of Article 3 (2) of the Special School Act (the central line offence); the cases falling under the proviso of Article 3 (2) of the Special School Act (the central line offence) - the cases falling under the general reason for illegal participation (the grounds for the suspension of execution): the previous conviction that has no longer been suspended; the decision of sentence] six months; the suspension of execution; the community service and