Text
1. The remaining amount after deducting the auction costs from each price of each land listed in the separate sheet by selling it to an auction;
Reasons
1. The land listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list No. 1 of the claim for partition of co-owned property (hereinafter referred to as "land No. 1 of this case") is owned by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff"), Appointor D, 12/46 shares, E, F, G, and H shares, 2/46 shares, 3/46 shares among them, 3/46 shares, 8/46 shares among them, and 8/46 shares among them, and the land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached list No. 2 of this case (hereinafter referred to as "the land No. 2 of this case"). The land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached list No. 1 and 2 of this case (hereinafter referred to as "each land of this case"), the Appointor did not own shares, 12/46 shares among them, 2/46 shares among them, and 3/46 shares among them, 3/46 shares among the Appointor and 1 share among the parties of this case, and the 2 of this case.
According to the above facts of recognition, there was no agreement on the method of partition among co-owners of each of the lands of this case, and there was no special agreement prohibiting partition of co-owned property. Thus, the plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter "the plaintiff et al.") may file a lawsuit against the defendants who are other co-owners pursuant to Article 269 (1) of the Civil Act, unless there are special circumstances.
2. Method of partition of co-owned property;
(a) Co-owned property partition by judgment shall be made in kind, in principle, as far as it is possible to make a rational partition according to the share of each co-owner, or, if it is impossible to divide in kind or in kind or if it is possible to divide in kind, the value thereof is likely to be remarkably reduced, an auction of the goods shall be ordered;