1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,855,656 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 29, 2018 to October 11, 2019 for the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 19, 2006, the Mayor of Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ddong and E Dong as F urban renewal acceleration district.

B. On June 7, 2007, the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the public perusal of the urban renewal acceleration plan (hereinafter “public perusal announcement of the instant improvement plan”) regarding the F urban renewal acceleration district as G by the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public announcement (hereinafter “Seoul Metropolitan Government public announcement”).

C. The Defendant is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project partnership that implements a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) in the F urban renewal acceleration district B (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”), and the Plaintiff is a tenant who completed a move-in report with the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H building (hereinafter “instant house”) located within the instant rearrangement district on December 15, 2008 (hereinafter “instant house”).

In around 2011, the Defendant publicly announced a compensation plan for relocation expenses, etc. to the tenants residing in the rearrangement zone of this case. On September 7, 2011, J, the Plaintiff’s spouse, filed an application with the Defendant for the compensation of relocation expenses (four members of household: J, the Plaintiff, K, and L), and the Defendant completed the move-in report on the instant house on December 15, 2008, and refused compensation for relocation expenses on the ground that the J did not meet all the requirements of “the person who resided in the rearrangement zone of this case for at least three months at the date of the public announcement of the public announcement of the improvement plan of this case ( June 7, 2007),” and thereafter, the Defendant filed an application with the Defendant for compensation for relocation expenses, but the Defendant rejected compensation for relocation expenses up to now.

E. The head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government announced the project implementation authorization for the instant rearrangement project on October 1, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 3, 6, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On December 2002, the plaintiff 1 of the parties asserted that the plaintiff purchased the house of this case and resided in the house of this case with her husband J and children K and L.