logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.07.01 2015가단42020
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 9,560,000 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the amount from March 12, 2016 to July 1, 2016.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract in the attached Form D with respect to the C Cost Star Vehicles (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). The Defendant is a person who suffered damage due to the instant accident deemed below.

B. D around 11:14 on February 7, 2015, at the gas station located in Pyeongtaek-si A, when entering the automatic washing machine owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant automatic washing machine”), D was damaged by shocking the driver’s boom, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”), and the Defendant suffered damages equivalent to the cost of repairing the instant automatic washing machine due to the instant accident.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute between the parties, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's insurance payment obligations against the defendant based on the insurance contract of this case in relation to the accident of this case does not exceed the above money, since the cost of repair of the automatic rent of this case due to the accident of this case 1,947,890 won.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the expenses incurred in repairing the instant automatic rent are KRW 15,329,412, and sought payment of the above money and damages for delay against the plaintiff.

3. In light of the above facts, the plaintiff is liable to compensate the defendant for damages equivalent to the repair cost of the automatic rent of this case caused by the accident of this case.

Furthermore, in relation to the scope of compensation for damages, if the health stand, the evidence set forth above, and the statement set forth in No. 1-3 of No. 1-3 of the evidence set forth above, and the result of each appraisal commission and fact inquiry conducted by the court in addition to the whole purport of the pleadings, the reasonable cost required to repair the automatic rent of this case destroyed 9,560,00 won (=total cost of the materials set forth in No. 7,420,336 won (=total cost of the materials set forth in No. Bidesh 1,440,000 won).

arrow