A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 26, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendant 1 was under the influence of alcohol on the first floor of the “sluncopty clock store” located in 927, as Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Sinsan, and obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime by assaulting the said C’s left c at one time, by taking into consideration how much the house was collected from C, who was called out after having received a report of the disturbance, and having received a notification of the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-1-4 months), i.e., the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months). [Determination of sentence] In order to establish the legal order of the State and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of official duties. However, in order to establish the law and order of the State and eradicate the light of the public authority, the defendant is against his mistake and is against himself, and