1. Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 1 of the separate sheet No. 2 among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

If the purport of the entire argument is added to the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5 as to the cause of the claim, the fact that the plaintiff lawfully reached the defendant's delivery of 30,00,000,000 won for lease deposit, monthly rent, 2,40,000 won for each of the above 1, 20,000,000 won for each of the above 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,7,8,9,10,100 square meters for each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 206 among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 on March 11, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "lease lease"), and that each of the above 30,0000,0000,0000 won for each of the above 25,20,016,0000 square meters for each of the following reasons:

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant main points to the Plaintiff as restitution to its original state, and is obligated to pay the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 2,400,000 per month from April 25, 2017 to the day on which the said delivery is completed, as the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent or rent.

The Plaintiff partially dismissed the main points of this case. However, in light of the fact that the lease term under the instant lease agreement was from March 25, 2016 to March 24, 2018, and that the payment period is 25 days prior to each month, etc., it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff can seek against the Defendant a claim against the Defendant for unpaid rent from April 25, 2017. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion on the above portion claimed in excess of the aforementioned period is without merit.

The plaintiff's claim of this case is partially accepted.