logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.08.29 2016가단38940
가등기말소
Text

1. The defendant shall accept on March 25, 1975 an all-round indictment of this court against the plaintiff with respect to the Taejin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City 668 square meters.

Reasons

1. Determination on both arguments

A. With respect to the land released from the Disposition No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land for convenience”), ① ownership transfer registration has been completed on September 29, 1965; ② on March 25, 1975, the provisional registration for preserving the right to claim ownership transfer upon the promise to trade (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”) was completed in the future on March 25, 1975; ③ on October 31, 2011, the additional registration of the above provisional registration pursuant to the “transfer of ownership transfer right” was completed in the Defendant’s future on October 31, 201, without dispute between the parties; ② the Plaintiff’s heir’s heir’s right to claim ownership transfer registration of this case from D around 1966 and the Plaintiff’s heir’s right to claim ownership transfer registration of this case had already been completed on September 1, 1965, and the Defendant cannot be deemed to have been aware of the fact that the Plaintiff’s heir’s right to claim ownership transfer registration of this case had already been terminated within 96.

B. As to this, the Defendant: (a) as the possession of the Plaintiff’s side of the instant land is so-called the so-called possession; (b) it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff acquired the instant land by prescription; and (c) the Plaintiff later caused the completion of the prescriptive acquisition period for the instant land.

arrow