beta
Text
The defendant is limited to the sale on November 17, 2007 with respect to the motor vehicles listed in the attached list from the plaintiff.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
In light of the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including the number of branch offices), the fact-finding reply to the Kimpo-si Office of Business of Registration of Kimpo-si of this Court, and the whole purport of the pleadings, the plaintiff requested the seller of the motor vehicle listed in the attached list (hereinafter referred to as the "motor vehicle of this case") around May 2007. The defendant purchased the motor vehicle of this case at the trade name in the Daegu Seo-gu office located in November 17, 2007, and entered into an insurance contract for the motor vehicle of this case in the name of the defendant on November 17, 2007 and November 17, 2008.
Judgment
Article 12 of the Automobile Management Act shall apply to the Mayor/Do governor for the registration of transfer of automobile ownership (hereinafter referred to as “registration of transfer”) under the conditions as prescribed by the Presidential Decree. In case where the transferee of an automobile intends to transfer it again to a third party, the transferee of an automobile shall make the registration of transfer as prescribed in paragraph (1) under his/her own name before transferring it (paragraph (3)), and in case where the transferee of an automobile fails to make an application for the registration of transfer as prescribed in paragraph (1), the transferor (referring to the owner recorded in the register at the time of the application for the registration of transfer) may apply for it in lieu
(Paragraph 4) is set forth.
According to the above facts, the defendant constitutes the transferee of the automobile of this case, and the defendant is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure for the automobile of this case from the plaintiff on November 17, 2007 pursuant to the above provisions, and it is reasonable to view that the plaintiff and the defendant are liable to pay taxes, public charges, and fine for negligence imposed on the defendant since November 17, 2007, the above sale date.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted as reasonable.