Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed in collusion with the Defendants at any coffee shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 2015, 2015, Defendant B introduced the victim D with “CF 100 billion won.”

I believe that 300 million won will be invested, I believe 100 million won will be invested, and make a false statement, followed by the following year.

3. In any coffee shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 25, the Defendants would create KRW 1 billion to the next victim within three months if the Defendants invested in the financial fund only 100 million.

However, even if it is wrong, the principal will be guaranteed by Defendant B.

Defendant

B The Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. operated the branch office of the Seoul Guarantee Insurance E, and in the case of the head of the Tong, the attachment of the head of the Tong will be paid with the money.

However, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to pay profits to the victims by managing the financial fund due to the lack of any particular income or assets.

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 100,000 to Defendant B’s corporate bank account on the 27th day of the same month from the victim.

2. Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant at any coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul around June 23, 2015, there is insufficient expenses for the victim D to make a business trip rapidly to China in relation to the acquisition of domestic cosmetics in the Chinese company.

Since all of the problems in Dao-si in China are immediately resolved, 500,000 won are loaned. The portion of 100,000 won invested prior to lending 5 million won is resolved, and 2 through 3 days is repaid to China.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any capacity to make investments in the merger of cosmetics companies due to the absence of any particular income or assets, and even if he borrowed money, he did not have any intent or ability to complete payment.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.