The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) ① The defendant has the honor to “defluence exactly and accurately infinitely in response to the question of the legal representative’s agent’s in the court of original judgment.”

As long as “the Defendant’s statement” refers to not giving a perjury against his memory, but rather making a sworn statement, and ② a loan certificate drawn up in C is merely formally drawn up, and thus, cannot be deemed as contrary to objective truth.

2. In the judgment of the court below, the defendant argued to the effect that the above facts are alleged to be erroneous, and the court below stated in detail about the above facts under the title "the judgment on the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel" and made a false statement contrary to memory, and the conclusion of the civil procedure in the judgment of the court

The court rejected the above argument of the defendant and found him guilty of the facts charged in this case.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is just and there is no error of law by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the defendant's appeal is corrected as "written evidence custody" in Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, which means "written evidence custody" in the column for the summary of evidence as of the second page of the judgment below.