logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.20 2015고합471
위계공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the “GLPG charging station” from the “GLP filling station in the Hanam-si, and a person who intends to operate a liquefied petroleum gas filling station in a development restriction zone shall reside in the relevant area from the time of

1. On March 31, 2009, the Defendant of a deceptive scheme related to the liquefied petroleum gas filling station in the Republic of Korea announced the Hanam-si Hanam-si Hanam-si that “plan for the placement of the liquefied petroleum gas filling station for automobiles within development-restricted zones”, and the Defendant was able to operate the liquefied petroleum gas filling station by filing an application for the designation of the business operator according to the above notification.

At that time, the Defendant introduced the J, which is qualified to reside from I, and then, the J applied for the business as if he did not intend to operate a liquefied petroleum gas charging station, and the Defendant was recruited to operate a charging station permitted under the name of J after paying the fees for the lending of name to J.

Pursuant to the above public offering, the J followed the procedure of applying for permission, such as submitting a “application for the selection of liquefied petroleum gas business entity,” as if it was operating a liquefied petroleum gas charging station, at the subordinate public service center of the Hanam-si, Hanam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, 1009. On June 15, 2009, the J had a public official in charge of not knowing the fact select as a final business entity.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with J, interfered with the selection of a liquefied petroleum gas business operator by the public official in charge of the lower-school viewing.

2. On December 29, 2008, the Defendant, at the time of the Speaker’s government, engaged in obstruction of the performance of official duties concerning liquefied petroleum gas filling stations, publicly announced the “plan for the placement of liquefied petroleum gas filling stations for motor vehicles within development-restricted zones” to the K House at the time of the Speaker’s government around December 29, 2008. The Defendant applied for the designation of a business operator, and was

The defendant is qualified to reside from L around that time.

arrow