The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Where a person who has acquired an automobile in the facts charged intends to transfer it again to a third party, he/she shall make a transfer registration in his/her name;

Nevertheless, around January 2012, the Defendant paid 2 million won in cash to a person who was in non-name in the old world near Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and acquired the vehicles to purchase (D) options in the name of UC.

Then, the Defendant: (a) while driving the said vehicle without the procedure for the registration of transfer in the name of the Defendant: (b) on January 2012, at the street at the entrance of the Sinsan-ro, including the “Mansan” located in Sinsan-si; (c) received cash of KRW 2 million from E and sold D options-related vehicles.

As such, the Defendant acquired an automobile and sold it to a third party without undergoing the change of name.

2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, upon receiving a request to purchase a vehicle from E, the Defendant purchased the vehicle as stated in the facts charged and delivered the vehicle to E, and that the Defendant did not have any transfer of the vehicle.

As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant made a statement at an investigative agency and made a statement at the investigative agency to the effect that “E purchased DNA observer vehicles from a person in the name unexponed by the Defendant who had sold a second class vehicle on the NAV bulletin bulletin around January 2012, and sold them to E at KRW 2 million without registering the transfer of the name on the same day” and “E purchased and operated D observer vehicles at KRW 2 million from a ship A, who was known to Pyeongtaek around January 2012, and transferred them to E without compensation on November 2012.” This statement at the investigative agency (Evidence No. 172 page).

In this regard, according to the statement made by the witness E in this court, E requested the defendant to purchase one vehicle, and the defendant purchased the vehicle at the request and transferred it to the defendant, E bears the purchase price of the vehicle, and the defendant made the purchase price of the vehicle in this court.