1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. Basic facts

A. D has completed the business registration under the trade name of Fmat (which is currently changed to Gmat, hereinafter “the instant marina”) in the Mae-gun, YYYE on October 16, 2006, and has operated the instant marina until now.

B. The Plaintiff concluded a contract to supply milk products in the instant marina, and supplied a product, including milk, from April 29, 2010 to August 17, 2017, but did not receive KRW 6,572,050 out of the price of the said product.

C. Defendant B is the husband of Defendant B, and Defendant C is the children of Defendant B and D, and Defendant C completed business registration with the same trade name as that of the instant marina and operated static meat with the same trade name in the space inside the instant marina on November 1, 2016, and was closed on September 7, 2017.

On August 23, 2017, Defendant C confirmed the details of the outstanding amount by hand to the Plaintiff on the unpaid status of each customer indicated as KRW 6,572,050, which the Plaintiff had not received from the instant marina.

E. In around 2017, Defendant B supplied goods to the instant marina over several occasions, examining the quantity, etc. of the said goods, and signed directly on the trading list.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In light of the following circumstances, i.e., D registered as the business entity of the instant marina and the Defendants’ family relationship, and ii) details of outstanding accounts signed by Defendant C, the Defendant C appears to have been accurately aware of the quantity and details of the goods supplied by the Plaintiff and the price of the goods paid, and iii) Defendant B also confirmed the quantity and unit price when the Plaintiff supplied the goods to the instant marina.