1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff is a person who sells sports events through the Plaintiff’s Internet shopping mall, and the Defendant is a member of the Internet shopping mall operated by the Plaintiff.

On November 2014, the Plaintiff brought about a situation in which it is inevitable for the Plaintiff to refund two products ordered by the Defendant, and thereafter, the Defendant sought the same judgment as the purport of the Defendant’s claim, on the website of C, that “I am a false statement on “I am a shot site, which is known to the Plaintiff, and I am a amper’s president and Stockholm once again I am a amper’s president and Stockholm.” However, due to the Defendant’s act as above, the Plaintiff suffered damages, such as defamation, fall, etc., of the company’s company’s reputation, and thus, I am a judgment.

B. Around December 2014, the Plaintiff issued an order for a new placing on the shopping mall operated by the Plaintiff and received approximately KRW 20,000 refund. After purchasing a new placing an order at the time, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to dispatch and confirm the goods to the Plaintiff several times since the goods did not arrive properly. The Plaintiff suffered mental damage rather than the Plaintiff by transferring the transportation company’s responsibility to the transportation company without the company.

In this paper, the defendant's order on December 24, 2014 was delayed in the receipt of goods after the order was issued on the car page "C" located in NAV, and the defendant's order was eventually delayed in return, and the above article added comments as argued by the plaintiff.

The defendant did not mention the plaintiff in the above comments, and did not contain any false fact or mention any defamation fact, and rather, the defendant is obliged to receive compensation for damage.

2. The Defendant did not indicate referring the Plaintiff on the NAB car page called C, and the content thereof is not a content that slanders the Plaintiff or defames the Plaintiff, and the expression of the comments, such as “the Plaintiff was made without any language,” and “the sponsor site,” etc. are somewhat excessive.