beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B and C jointly and severally KRW 50,000,000;
B. Defendant B and C are jointly and severally with Defendant D.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff respectively lent KRW 30,000,000 to Defendant B and G around October 17, 2007, and KRW 20,000,000 around October 19, 207.
B. Around October 18, 2007, Defendant B, C, and G made a cash custody certificate stating that the Plaintiff would pay KRW 50,000,000 to the Plaintiff by October 25, 2007, and would be liable for civil and criminal liability if the Plaintiff violated this.
C. After that, on October 24, 2007, the net G prepared a certificate of cash promise custody with the purport that it would pay the Plaintiff KRW 50,000,000 to November 1, 2007 (cash storage certificate) and Defendant B would pay the Plaintiff KRW 50,000,000 to the Plaintiff by November 1, 2007.
The deceased G died on November 11, 2009, and the heir is Defendant D and his/her spouse, Defendant E and F.
E. Meanwhile, on August 28, 2017, Defendant E and F were subject to an inheritance limited approval trial (Seoul District Court Decision 2017 Modan60243).
[Ground of recognition] Defendant C: The remaining Defendants of the judgment by public notice: The absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including the serial number), Eul evidence No. 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, Defendant B and C jointly and severally with the above Defendants, and jointly and severally with the above Defendants, KRW 50,00,00,00,00, the Defendant D, the heir of the network G, is jointly and severally obligated to pay the Plaintiff the loan amount of KRW 21,428,571 (=50,000 x 3/7), Defendant E and F, within the scope of property inherited from the network G, respectively, KRW 14,285,714 (=5,714 x 50,000 x 2/7) and each of the above payments, within the scope of property inherited from the network G (i.e., KRW 50,000 x 2/7) and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from the following day of November 2, 207 to May 17, 2018.
On the other hand, Defendant D reported marriage due to the net G threat and coercion, and thus, the heir is null and void.