1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is a corporation whose main business is building and facility management business, cleaning business, etc., and the defendant is a management body established with all sectional owners as members pursuant to Article 23(1) of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings”) with respect to building B located in Bupyeong-si D (hereinafter “the instant building”).

B. From 2006 to 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a management services contract with E representing the Defendant for the instant building, and entered into a management services contract with F representing the Defendant on January 21, 2015.

C. 1) On May 28, 2014, the occupants of the instant building, at the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the conference of the management body and the appointment of the representatives and executive officers of the management body of the council of the council of the council of the council of the conference of the council of the conference of the conference of the management body of the council of the council of the council of the conference of the conference of June 4, 2014, appointed C as a new manager of the defendant, appointed C at the meeting of the management body of the council of the conference of the conference of the

3) Although the Defendant requested a perusal of the documents kept by the former administrator E and the Plaintiff, the Defendant refused it, and then filed a civil petition at Bupyeong-si around July 2014, and at the Defendant’s request, Seocheon-si provided administrative guidance to E and the Plaintiff, but E did not show the documents kept by itself to the Defendant. Ultimately, E was subject to a disposition of a fine for negligence of KRW 1 million from Seocheon-si, which was subject to a disposition of KRW 1,00,000,000,000,000 won was imposed by the court on November 18, 2014, but the Plaintiff’s representative interfered with the Plaintiff’s facility management by forging the Defendant’s seal and distributing printed materials affixed thereon.