A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 High Order 61" was committed by the Defendant on February 10, 2017 by entering a religious facility, such as a church and a saving, who could have stolen cash, and was committed again by the same veterinary method after being released from the probation on February 10, 2017.

On March 21, 2017, around 11:30, the Defendant intruded into D church located in C with an unlocked entrance, and stolen cash of KRW 383,00,00, in total, eight times from that time to April 17, 2017, including: (a) the Victim E, who was located at the right side of the entrance of the second floor towing room, collected the enormous number of trees with a double cover tape, and deducted them by attaching a paper paper.

On April 12, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 80,” went into the G church located in F in the Southern Si of 1:10 on April 12, 2017, and tried to commit a theft of cash in addition to the money managed by the victim H at the entrance of the second floor worship, but did not go through an attempted attempt due to the absence of cash.

Summary of Evidence

2017 Highest 61

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of E, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO 80 Godan 2017;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of intrusion on a structure), Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The sentencing factors under Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, as well as other factors of sentencing, including Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and all the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the arguments, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors:

The factors of favorable sentencing are the recognition of their errors and reflects, the amount of damage is not significant, and the house is leaving.