logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.03 2016누56549
취득세등부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of some contents, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the

Part II, the term “representative” shall be deemed to be the “representative” and the term “wons” shall be added to the following: “6,450,520” in Part 17.

Part 4, Paragraph 3, "business type", "type of business", "type of business", "type of business", "manufacturing power equipment for motor vehicle on the same day", "the manufacturing business of motor vehicle power equipment for the same day" shall be "the manufacturing business of motor vehicle power transmission equipment for the same day", and "the representative director" shall be "the representative director", respectively.

Part 7, "Representative Director" shall be appointed as "Representative".

Part 10, "Acquisition Tax" is higher than "Acquisition Tax".

The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow