A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on July 7, 2005; a fine of 300,000 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license); a fine of 2 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license); a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license); a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license); a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license); and a fine of 600,00 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the same court on September 29, 201; and a fine of 600,000 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on October 30, 2012; and a court on May 26, 2013>

Criminal facts

On September 15, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license around 16:30 on September 15, 2014, driven B Poter Cargo at a section of about 1 km from the front of the Do of the head of Gyeonggi Kimpo-si to the private distance of the same Eup as the Do of the same Eup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. Report on the situation of driving without a license, a written consent to voluntary driving, and a disposition to revoke a driver's license;

1. A written non-holding of driver's license;

1. A criminal investigation report (attached to trial records, etc.);

1. Investigation report (verification of details of public announcement of revocation of license);

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (a) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. The reason for imposing the sentence of alternative sentence of imprisonment is consistent with the defense that the defendant was not aware of the cancellation of the driver's license, and the defendant was not aware of the fact that he was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, even though he was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment.