logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.12 2015고단2189
상표법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, which was known through the “B,” a Chinese hosting site, carried in the Republic of China through a disguised aviation with counterfeit goods purchased by individual consumers, and conspired to receive counterfeit goods through customs clearance at the Kimpo Airport Customs Office, and then to deliver them to domestic distributors.

피고인은 2014. 10. 29. 17:00경 서울 강서구 김포공항 내 화물청사에서, 위 성명불상자가 중국에서 항공편을 통하여 보낸, 상표권자 샤넬의 등록상표(대한민국 특허청 등록번호 제0304800호)를 모방하여 만든 유사상표가 부착된 가방을 비롯한 별지일람표 기재 위조 상품 총 3,436점 정품가액 약 4,425,420,000원 상당 을, 고양시 일산동구 D에 있는 창고로 운반한 후 이를 재포장하여 국내 유통업자들에게 유통하기 위하여 소지하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the trademark rights of each trademark right holder in collusion with the above-mentioned person in bad name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of E, F, and G;

1. The police statement of H and I;

1. Investigation report (No. 30,38 No. 1)

1. Seizure records;

1. Details of mail, replys to request for appraisal, and application of the statutes of the original trademark register;

1. Relevant Articles of the Trademark Act, Article 93 of the Trademark Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 97-2(1) of the Trademark Act (amended by Act No. 97-2(1) (amended by Act No. 1000), where the infringing goods are not distributed in the mitigated area (one month to one year) (Special Mitigation) (amended by Act No. 1004, Jan. 1, 200).

arrow