logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.10 2016가단23675
임차료등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 71,429,010 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from July 1, 2015 to June 15, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 1, 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant on the condition that the lease deposit was KRW 60 million, monthly rent of KRW 2.5 million, and the lease term was 24 months with respect to the building for reinforced concrete C on the ground, the building for steel-frame building among the building for steel-frame building owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant building”).

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). D, who was the former representative director of the Defendant, prepared a lease agreement with the Plaintiff at the time.

(A) Evidence No. 1). (b)

Meanwhile, from August 27, 2012 to January 12, 2015, the Defendant placed its head office in the instant building.

(A) Evidence No. 8) (c)

The defendant paid a total of three million won from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015, which is the expiration date of the lease term, and did not pay the remainder of the monthly rent, electricity fee, deposit, etc. at all.

The electricity charges to be borne by the Defendant during the lease period are as follows:

(A) Evidence Nos. 6 and 7, and the Defendant did not dispute the details of these electric charges. The instant monthly electric charges (won) on July 369, 2013, 220

8. 710,170

9. 618,060 654,230 627,240 ; 240 ; 746,470 ; 745,40 ;

2. 791,320

3. 643,140

4. 635,330

5. 759,620

66,630

7. 651,570

8. 710,490

9. 436,050 Oct. 5, 200, 240 November 51, 240,070. 491,880 January 485, 2015;

2. 515,660

3. 470,240

4. 484,390

Above 5. 482,150 up to

6. 16.494,740

Above 6. 17

6. 30. 228,110 Aggregate 14,429,010

E. The defendant has been leaving his house in the building of this case, even until now.

(A) Evidence Nos. 10. 10. 【Reason for Recognition】 1, 6 through 8, and 10

2. The fact that the Defendant did not pay the remainder of KRW 71,429,010 (=60,429,000) out of the monthly rent of KRW 60,00,00 ( = 2,50,000 x 24 months) and the former rent of KRW 14,429,010 for 24 months even though the Defendant entered into the instant lease contract with the Plaintiff, and paid KRW 3,00,000 (=60,000,000 - KRW 14,429,000).

Therefore, the defendant is under special circumstances.

arrow