The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is a member of the E market merchants' association, who operates a d market in Osan-si, Osan-si.

A. On June 15, 2014, at around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) was the spouse of G and G; (b) the victim H, the president of the E merchants’ association, was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the other in the said D market and was the other who was the other who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the other in the said market; (c) even though there was no fact that the victim H was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the other in the said

And each month, the entrance fee was set up and the membership fee was set up.

Along with people's money coming from a dam breath.

The victim H’s honor was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, which read that the electricity production facility and the content purchase cost used by himself/herself had been shamped so that the merchants of an unspecified market can hear.

B. On June 17, 2014, the Defendant called to the J that operates both ends-of-end street shops in the said market and called “H and G performed funeral services on a day.”

The honor of the victim H and G was damaged by openly pointing out false facts as K’s money.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Although the Defendant and the defense counsel did not have examined the complainants at each time and at each place specified in the facts charged, they filed a complaint on the ground of false witnesses to gather the Defendant.

B. The burden of proof for the facts charged in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes a judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the interest of the defendant should be judged (Supreme Court Decision 2002Do6110 Decided February 11, 2003, Supreme Court Decision 2002Do6110 Decided February 11, 2003),