logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.11.30 2018고단1731
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a driver car with Cgallon.

On June 17, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.132% from blood alcohol level around 02:00 and continued to turn to the left at the right right on the side of the T-distance intersection in front of the fact that the said car is in D at opticalyang-si.

At the time, there are many vehicles parked on the two lanes, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to see the front side as a person engaged in driving business and to operate the steering system accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to go on the left and left at the left by leaving the left-hand side without neglecting it, brought the part of the back-hand part of the Genz E220d car, which was parked on the two-lanes facing the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, into the front-hand part of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the victim’s car by occupational negligence as above, approximately KRW 33,443,30 of the repair cost.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven a gallon with alcohol concentration of about 100 meters from the road near the “I” restaurant located in H at G at the time of the above day to the place of the accident around that time, while under the influence of alcohol leveling about 0.132% from the 100-meter section of the blood during the above day to the place of the accident.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, who owns a passenger car with the above gallon, operated a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance, such as paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and a statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking alcohol;

1. The next inquiry (No. 17 No. 17) and the inquiry about mandatory insurance;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of traffic accident evidence examination and photographing statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow