1. The Defendant received on September 29, 2010 the Seoul Central District Court received on September 29, 201 as to the real estate stated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff.

1. If the purport of the entire argument is added to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff and the defendant: on August 29, 2010, the plaintiff and the defendant donated the real estate indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") to the defendant; however, the defendant cannot use the real estate of this case for any purpose other than a child care center after the plaintiff donated the real estate of this case; the defendant is responsible for the principal and interest of the secured obligation of the right to collateral security, which was completed on the real estate of this case; if the real estate of this case is not performed, the contract of this case shall be null and void as the cause of donation" (hereinafter "the donation contract of this case"); the plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the real estate of this case to the defendant on September 29, 2010 as the donation contract of this case under the receipt of No. 58861, which was delivered to the defendant, but the defendant did not pay any interest on the secured obligation of the real estate of this case after the donation of this case, the plaintiff 201.

According to the above facts, since the contract of this case was lawfully cancelled due to the defendant's default, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration as to the real estate of this case as restitution to the plaintiff.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.