logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.03.14 2013고단329
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Gwangju District Court to a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on May 23, 201, from the Gwangju District Court to a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Criminal facts

1. Around 23:50 on December 28, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (ex post-accident measures) driving a two-lane of family center located in the Dong-dong, Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong, and driving a BM5 vehicle at the front of the family center in the Dong-dong, Gwangju-gu, and driving a two-lane of the BM5 vehicle on the front side of the court, moving back from the

At the time, it was difficult for a driver to drive a motor vehicle at night and snow, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle by checking the front and rear sides well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to discover the DNA car of the victim C(34 years old) that was driven by one lane in the opposite direction while he was negligent in doing so, and did not change the left-hand side of the damaged vehicle into the front-hand side of the damaged vehicle.

Even though the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by the same occupational negligence in order to have the amount equivalent to KRW 225,00,000, the Defendant immediately stopped and did not take necessary measures.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) were driven by the said vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol by 0.162% at the above time and at the above place (the fluence of the road driving, the walking string, the snow string, the snow string, and the snow string), while driving the said vehicle at the above time and at the above place

At the time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by looking at the front, rear, and driving of a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle at night.

Nevertheless, the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol and was negligent in driving under the influence of normal driving.

arrow