logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.09.05 2013고단888
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,00 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Goyang Branch District Court of Jung-gu, Seoul on June 2, 2009, a fine of KRW 2 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Southern Branch District Court of Seoul on June 2, 2009, and on July 5, 201, to a punishment of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Goyang Branch Branch Branch of the Jung-gu District Court of the Republic of Korea on July

On June 16, 2013, at around 22:55, the Defendant driven a B art car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.083% at the section of approximately 1 km from the 23:01 on the day before the alcohol house in which it is impossible to find out the trade name near the original station of Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu to the front road before the transformation station located in Seoyang-gu 188, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry the results of the drinking driving control;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for detention in the workhouse are the defendant again commits a crime during the period of probation of imprisonment due to a drunk driving, and the drinking driving indicated in the criminal facts falls under the fourth drinking driving, but the degree of blood alcohol contained in the criminal facts committed by the defendant does not reach the state of drinking, and the defendant commits a crime against the wrongness. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow